20 Comments
Aug 5Liked by Max Wang

Before you publish this article, recently Holy Spirit told me that Revelation 13:18 is those who took the abomination!

Expand full comment

I believe that so strongly

Expand full comment
Aug 5Liked by Max Wang

Revelation 13:16 “And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:”

in …….., .. in as ‘in’ verse above is translated as ‘on’ ….., .. ‘on’ in many other ‘modern’ translations

and considering God’s word was given to us in English over 400 years ago in the KJB the only Holy bible, the ‘in’ surely that helps all that have been misled see more clearly where the subtle deceptions are ‘in’ the ‘modern’ books and .. on

it is very clear for most these days the sign or mark will likely be ‘in’ your hand or forehead. How brilliant, wonderful truly amazing our Lord Christ Jesus and eternal Father having made it so simple for all who would see to discern the truth.

Expand full comment
Aug 10Liked by Max Wang

The Papacy is the 1st. beast of Revelations (anti-Christ) and the mark of the beast is obeying (hand) and worshipping (forehead) his commands. SDA's believe that mandatory Sunday worship will be ordered and those that obey will receive the mark. Others say that during the dark ages and the inquisition, those that enforced the Popes commands to kill heretics received the mark as well. I don't believe it has anything to do with genetic engineering.

The 2nd. beast is either the black Pope (Jesuit superior general) or the United States government, we won't know until something happens showing who/what is the 2nd beast.

Expand full comment
Nov 17Liked by Max Wang

They ALL serve Rome. I think the Jesuit false prophet Superior general black pope (as some have called him) controls the U.N. Well, they control just about everything, behind the scenes. But we know who is REALLY IN CONTROL. Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. They cannot do anything aside from His Will. "He who sits in the heavens will laugh..." Do they really believe that they will defeat God?! But, prophecies will be fulfilled, as they gather their armies together for the end time battle. WE KNOW WHO WINS!!!

Expand full comment

How are you seeing Sunday worship to do with buying and selling? Sunday is the day when they worship now. The Bible states its done by deceit, very clear in these scriptures, Rev 18:23, 9:21, 19:20.

Expand full comment
Aug 21Liked by Max Wang

My comment was that the SDA (Seventh Day Adventists) believes that there will be a merger of church and state and that they will enforce Sunday Laws to try and combat the climate change hoax and if you don't participate in their forced Sunday (Blue) Laws you won't be able to buy or sell.

Most worship on Sunday, I don't. I believe the 10 commandments are still binding. The 4th commandment is crystal clear:

Exo_20:8  Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy.

Deceived:

Rev 18:23  And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived.

Sorceries according to Strongs Concordance:

G5331

φαρμακεία

pharmakeia

far-mak-i'-ah

From G5332; medication (“pharmacy”), that is, (by extension) magic (literal or figurative): - sorcery, witchcraft.

Eph_5:6  Let no man deceive you with vain words: for because of these things cometh the wrath of God upon the children of disobedience.

2Th_2:3  Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;

1Jn_3:7  Little children, let no man deceive you: he that doeth righteousness is righteous, even as he is righteous.

Moral of the story is, Don't be deceived.

Expand full comment
Aug 31Liked by Max Wang

Correct, don't be deceived, many are. Sorceries is pharmakeia, that is where the deceit came into it. Changing a worship day isn't deceit is plain to see and doesn't fit with Rev 18:23 and Rev 19:20 Which includes the false prophet (religious figure) who encouraged everyone....

Expand full comment
Nov 17Liked by Max Wang

Rev_12:17  And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.

Rev_14:12  Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.

Rev_22:14  Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.

Expand full comment

Praise Jesus

Expand full comment
Nov 17Liked by Max Wang

I'd like to add to what you shared, about God's light being a light unto our path, and a lamp unto our feet. A favorite of mine is Psalm 18:28 - For thou wilt light my candle: the Lord my God will enlighten my darkness. it's why I chose a candle. Also in Rev. 18:23 - And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee: Just as I've seen the light in the eyes of believers go out when they have walked away from the Lord...their light indeed goes out. DON'T EVER LET GOD'S candle (light) go out...by forsaking Him or taking on an evil heart of unbelief. It's so sad watching the changes...and they cannot be reached, no matter how hard we try--or share scriptures or pray--Only God knows what turned them away, and/or if they have committed the unpardonable sin, or of whom He may have given over to delusion. All will be righteous judgment. I love the Hymn, Farther Along, we'll know all about it, farther along, we'll understand why--cheer up my brother, live in the sunshine, we'll understand it, all by and by.

Expand full comment

I will follow you Max. But the Babylonian forgeries begin in Genesis 2. The True Gospel and the antichrist religion are both in the AKJV. Genesis 1: True Gospel. Genesis 2: antichrist religion. I know that's hard to hear. But God never promised us a book. He promises us a personal relationship with Him.

Expand full comment

Rev 22:18_19 The word Book is mentioned 5 times in two short verses

Expand full comment

This is the wicked spirit speaking in Revelation 22:18-19. The Council of Tent: Romsnism false church. That's not the Lord in Revelation 22. It's the papacy adding a false chapter - issuing anathema. You see the game? That Bible came through the hands of Rome. Of course conspiracy to add chapters and books was acted upon.

Council of Trent RCC:

Decree Concerning the Canonical Scriptures

Decretum de Canonicis Scripturis

The sacred and holy, ecumenical, and general Synod of Trent,—lawfully assembled in the Holy Ghost, the same three legates of the Apostolic See presiding therein,—keeping this always in view, that, errors being removed, the purity itself of the Gospel be preserved in the Church; which (Gospel), before promised through the prophets in the holy Scriptures, our Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, first promulgated with His own mouth, and then commanded to be preached by His Apostles to every creature, as the fountain of all, both saving truth, and moral discipline; and seeing clearly that this truth and discipline are contained in the written books, and the unwritten traditions which, received by the Apostles from the mouth of Christ himself, or from the Apostles themselves, the Holy Ghost dictating, have come down even unto us, transmitted as it were from hand to hand; (the Synod) following the examples of the orthodox Fathers, receives and venerates with an equal affection of piety, and reverence, all the books both of the Old and of the New Testament—seeing that one God is the author of both —as also the said traditions, as well those appertaining to faith as to morals, as having been dictated, either by Christ's own word of mouth, or by the Holy Ghost, and preserved in the Catholic Church by a continuous succession.

And it has thought it meet that a list of the sacred books be inserted in this decree, lest a doubt may arise in any one's mind, which are the books that are received by this Synod. They are as set down here below:

Of the Old Testament: the five books of Moses, to wit, Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy; Josue, Judges, Ruth, four books of Kings, two of Paralipomenon, the first book of Esdras, and the second which is entitled Nehemias; Tobias, Judith, Esther, Job, the Davidical Psalter, consisting of a hundred and fifty psalms; the Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, the Canticle of Canticles, Wisdom, Ecclesiasticus, Isaias, Jeremias, with Baruch; Ezechiel, Daniel; the twelve minor prophets, to wit, Osee, Joel, Amos, Abdias, Jonas, Micheas, Nahum, Habacuc, Sophonias, Aggaeus, Zacharias, Malachias; two books of the Machabees, the first and the second.

Of the New Testament: the four Gospels, according to Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John; the Acts of the Apostles written by Luke the Evangelist; fourteen epistles of Paul the apostle, (one) to the Romans, two to the Corinthians, (one) to the Galatians, to the Ephesians, to the Philippians, to the Colossians, two to the Thessalonians, two to Timothy, (one) to Titus, to Philemon, to the Hebrews; two of Peter the apostle, three of John the apostle, one of the apostle James, one of Jude the apostle, and the Apocalypse of John the apostle.

But if any one receive not, as sacred and canonical, the said books entire with all their parts, as they have been used to be read in the Catholic Church, and as they are contained in the old Latin vulgate edition; and knowingly and deliberately contemn the traditions aforesaid; let him be anathema. Let all, therefore, understand, in what order, and in what manner, the said Synod, after having laid the foundation of the Confession of faith, will proceed, and what testimonies and authorities it will mainly use in confirming dogmas, and in restoring morals in the Church.

Decree Concerning the Edition and the Use of the Sacred Books

Decretum de Editione et Usu Sacrorum Librorum

Moreover, the same sacred and holy Synod,—considering that no small utility may accrue to the Church of God, if it be made known which out of all the Latin editions, now in circulation, of the sacred books, is to be held as authentic,—ordains and declares, that the said old and vulgate edition, which, by the lengthened usage of so many ages, has been approved of in the Church, be, in public lectures, disputations, sermons and expositions, held as authentic; and that no one is to dare, or presume to reject it under any pretext whatever.

Furthermore, in order to restrain petulant spirits, It decrees, that no one, relying on his own skill, shall,—in matters of faith, and of morals pertaining to the edification of Christian doctrine, —wresting the sacred Scripture to his own senses, presume to interpret the said sacred Scripture contrary to that sense which holy mother Church,—whose it is to judge of the true sense and interpretation of the holy Scriptures,—hath held and doth hold; or even contrary to the unanimous consent of the Fathers; even though such interpretations were never (intended) to be at any time published. Contraveners shall be made known by their Ordinaries, and be punished with the penalties by law established.

And wishing, as is just, to impose a restraint, in this matter, also on printers, who now without restraint,—thinking, that is, that whatsoever they please is allowed them,—print, without the license of ecclesiastical superiors, the said books of sacred Scripture, and the notes and comments upon them of all persons indifferently, with the press ofttimes unnamed, often even fictitious, and what is more grievous still, without the author's name; and also keep for indiscriminate sale books of this kind printed elsewhere; (this Synod) ordains and decrees, that, henceforth, the sacred Scripture, and especially the said old and vulgate edition, be printed in the most correct manner possible; and that it shall not be lawful for any one to print, or cause to be printed, any books whatever, on sacred matters, without the name of the author; nor to sell them in future, or even to keep them, unless they shall have been first examined, and approved of, by the Ordinary; under pain of the anathema and fine imposed in a canon of the last Council of Lateran: and, if they be Regulars, besides this examination and approval, they shall be bound to obtain a license also from their own superiors, who shall have examined the books according to the form of their own statutes. As to those who lend, or circulate them in manuscript, without their having been first examined, and approved of, they shall be subjected to the same penalties as printers: and they who shall have them in their possession or shall read them, shall, unless they discover the authors, be themselves regarded as the authors. And the said approbation of books of this kind shall be given in writing; and for this end it shall appear authentically at the beginning of the book, whether the book be written, or printed; and all this, that is, both the approbation and the examination, shall be done gratis, that so what ought to be approved, may be approved, and what ought to be condemned, may be condemned.

Besides the above, wishing to repress that temerity, by which the words and sentences of sacred Scripture are turned and twisted to all sorts of profane uses, to wit, to things scurrilous, fabulous, vain, to flatteries, detractions, superstitions, impious and diabolical incantations, sorceries, and defamatory libels; (the Synod) commands and enjoins, for the doing away with this kind of irreverence and contempt, and that no one may henceforth dare in any way to apply the words of sacred Scripture to these and such like purposes; that all men of this description, profaners and violators of the word of God, be by the bishops restrained by the penalties of law, and others of their own appointment.

https://www.bible-researcher.com/trent1.html

Expand full comment
author

You have the right to comment. It is your freedom to believe what you want to believe. However, my stand is that every word of God in the 66 books of the Holy is the inspired word of God. Every word of God in the 1611 King James Bible, including Revelation 22 is inspired. I do not believe in the theory of man. Any theory for the matter. Except it comes from the Holy Bible, I cannot believe. This is my firm and immutable stand. It cannot be changed, not in this life, and not in the world to come.

Expand full comment

Did you ever notice that Revelation would better end at Revelation 21? A person must know the Lord. And soteriology. Sound doctrine. Who do you think added Revelation 22? Because it changes salvation doctrine. It says you will lose your salvation over a book. If you add to the book or take away: beware! You're going to Hades! In what theological world does that make sense? It doesn't. The Romans (and Babylonians) have added chapters and books to the Bible. Does this "end Christianity"? No. Because real faith in God being born again never depended on a book. It's the modern world that has printing presses that erroneously thinks so. Most of the world population has not been able to read and didn't have a Bible in world history. But we're born again and knew God. The last chapter of the Gospel of John is forged and added by Rome. Forgeries abound.

But my quest is complete. I am satisfied. I saw the Lord and I understand how Romanism has corrupted the church.

As born again believers, we don't need a book. It's enough to know the Lord.

The book is stopping believers from practicing the Presence of God and knowing Him as He is in personal relationship.

Expand full comment

No it wouldn't make sense to end it at chpt 21, 22:18 the warning is there for a purpose, adding or taking away is altering GODS written word and deserves what ever GOD decides, inferior man has no right. How can anyone be born again without knowing GODS Word in his book, who HE is and who HIS Son is?

Just a quick response to your other post, the Ethiopian bible which is the oldest bible contains all 88 books unlike 66 of other Bibles.

All bibles in my opinion should contain all the Apocrypha books.

Expand full comment

See. You don't agree that the Apocryphal should have been removed. Well, people who know God the Son don't need books added by Rome. Inferior man added books. Do you worship statues?

Expand full comment

GOD the Son? Do I worship statues? That question is ridiculous too stupid to warrant a reply 🙄

Expand full comment

It's the same difference. You could worship the so-called early apostles in statue or letter form. Both are the same idolatry.

Expand full comment