yesterday I learned of an acquaintance who passed away (he was probably in his early forties)… before bed, prayed that God look after his wife and three children … he came to me in a dream that night looking healthy & happy.
Hi Laurie, I was into the first 15 mins of his sharing, and noticed that he was criticising the King James Bible, preferring his own interpretation of the bible rather than adhering to what the bible actually says. Therefore, to him the 1,000 years is just something symbolic, not a real physical 1,000 years. He also mentioned about the last trump, but that's built upon his own understanding (according to his own interpretation) of the bible. Since he doesn't believe the bible word for word, he could stage his argument on something and he will appear to be right according to his own interpretation. To me, this is a no-no. I believe the 1611 King James Bible word for word. Whatever the 1611 King James Bible says, it is thus saith the LORD. There can be no greater authority than the written word of God in the 66 books of the Holy Bible.
Hi Laurie, the Interlinear Bible doesn't even use the same base text as the 1611 King James Bible. Go to https://bereanbible.com/bgb/
"The Greek source is documented for all renderings, with the following major sources being considered: Nestle, SBL, and Nestle Aland 28th Edition, Textus Receptus, Byzantine, Greek Orthodox, Tischendorf, Westcott and Hort, as well as a variety of manuscripts on which these critical texts are based."
Base text and orthography is the Nestle 1904 Greek New Testament. Paragraph formatting has been adapted from Westcott and Hort, 1881 and the Berean Study Bible.
1611 King James Bible is based on:
Masoretic Text (1524-25 Jacob Ben Chayyim text, 2nd edition of the Rabbinic Bible published by Daniel Bomberg) for the Old Testament;
Textus Receptus (an edition of the Greek texts of the New Testament established by Erasmus in the 16th century) for the New Testament.
BTW, the New King James Bible was not translated strictly from the base text for the 1611 King James Bible. Just for your info.
yesterday I learned of an acquaintance who passed away (he was probably in his early forties)… before bed, prayed that God look after his wife and three children … he came to me in a dream that night looking healthy & happy.
Hi Laurie, I was into the first 15 mins of his sharing, and noticed that he was criticising the King James Bible, preferring his own interpretation of the bible rather than adhering to what the bible actually says. Therefore, to him the 1,000 years is just something symbolic, not a real physical 1,000 years. He also mentioned about the last trump, but that's built upon his own understanding (according to his own interpretation) of the bible. Since he doesn't believe the bible word for word, he could stage his argument on something and he will appear to be right according to his own interpretation. To me, this is a no-no. I believe the 1611 King James Bible word for word. Whatever the 1611 King James Bible says, it is thus saith the LORD. There can be no greater authority than the written word of God in the 66 books of the Holy Bible.
Hi Laurie, the Interlinear Bible doesn't even use the same base text as the 1611 King James Bible. Go to https://bereanbible.com/bgb/
"The Greek source is documented for all renderings, with the following major sources being considered: Nestle, SBL, and Nestle Aland 28th Edition, Textus Receptus, Byzantine, Greek Orthodox, Tischendorf, Westcott and Hort, as well as a variety of manuscripts on which these critical texts are based."
Base text and orthography is the Nestle 1904 Greek New Testament. Paragraph formatting has been adapted from Westcott and Hort, 1881 and the Berean Study Bible.
1611 King James Bible is based on:
Masoretic Text (1524-25 Jacob Ben Chayyim text, 2nd edition of the Rabbinic Bible published by Daniel Bomberg) for the Old Testament;
Textus Receptus (an edition of the Greek texts of the New Testament established by Erasmus in the 16th century) for the New Testament.
BTW, the New King James Bible was not translated strictly from the base text for the 1611 King James Bible. Just for your info.